Christmas Message from Wartime

December 1944 was a key time during WWII. D-Day was over, and the Allied forces were moving forward rapidly, pushing the Nazis out of western Europe and back into Germany. But in mid-December, the Germans began an unexpected assault against the Americans, resulting in the six-week long Battle of the Bulge high in the mountains in the middle of winter. Extended bad weather (days of fog, snow, and torrential rain) grounded American airplanes and hindered the movement of American troops.

The forces of General George Patton were taking the brunt of the attack. On December 8th, Patton contacted his top chaplain, General James O’Neill, and asked for a prayer to change the weather.1

Patton explained:

God has His part, or margin in everything, that’s where prayer comes in. . . . We’ve got to get not only the chaplains but every man in the Third Army to pray. We must ask God to stop these rains.2

Chaplain O’Neill responded to Patton’s request by writing out a short prayer that was approved and printed and given to each of the 250,000 American soldiers.3

Each man prayed:

Almighty and most merciful Father, we humbly beseech Thee, of Thy great goodness, to restrain these immoderate rains with which we have had to contend. Grant us fair weather for Battle. Graciously hearken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that, armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory, and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies and establish Thy justice among men and nations.

The reverse of the card carried a Christmas greeting from Patton:

To each officer and soldier in the Third United States Army, I Wish a Merry Christmas. I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty, and skill in battle. We march in our might to complete victory. May God’s blessings rest upon each of you on this Christmas Day.

These prayer cards were distributed to the troops on December 12-14, and on December 20th, the weather cleared, allowing the planes to return to the air,4 leading to an eventual hard-fought victory for the Allies.

As we celebrate Christmas with our families, history reminds us that God responds when people lift up their voices in prayer.5

From all of us at WallBuilders, Merry Christmas!


Endnotes

1 Evan Andrews, “8 Things You May Not Know About the Battle of the Bulge,” August 22, 2023, History.
2 Msgr. James H. O’Neill, “The True Story of The Patton Prayer,” originally published in Review of the News (October 6, 1971).
3 Msgr. James H. O’Neill, “The True Story of The Patton Prayer,” originally published in Review of the News (October 6, 1971).
4 Msgr. James H. O’Neill, “The True Story of The Patton Prayer,” originally published in Review of the News (October 6, 1971); “Interactive Timeline: Battle of the Bulge,” Library of Congress.
5 Matthew 18:19-20.

A member of the American military stands beside a US flag raised after the Battle of Iwo Jima.

Proclamation – Thanksgiving Day – 1944


The following is the text of a national Thanksgiving proclamation issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on November 1, 1944. The Thanksgiving day was to take place on November 23, 1944. The images of the Proclamation are from the National Archives and Records Administration.


Red # 26058 13-A1-019 Research Request

Red # 26058 13-A1-019 Research Request


THANKSGIVING DAY, 1944

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION

In this year of liberation, which has seen so many millions freed from tyrannical rule, it is fitting that we give thanks with special fervor to our Heavenly Father for the mercies we have received individually and as a nation and for the blessings He has restored, through the victories of our arms and those of our Allies, to His children in other lands.

For the preservation of our way of life from the threat of destruction; for the unity of spirit which has kept our Nation strong; for our abiding faith in freedom; and for the promise of an enduring peace, we should lift up our hearts in thanksgiving.

For the harvest that has sustained us and, in its fullness, brought succor to other peoples; for the bounty of our soil, which has produced the sinews of war for the protection of our liberties; and for a multitude of private blessings, known only in our hearts, we should give united thanks to God.

To the end that we may bear more earnest witness to our gratitude to Almighty God, I suggest a nationwide reading of the Holy Scriptures during the period from Thanksgiving Day to Christmas. Let every man of every creed go to his own version of the Scriptures for a renewed and strengthening contact with those eternal truths and majestic principles which have inspired such measure of true greatness as this nation has achieved.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, President of the United States of America, in consonance with the joint resolution of the Congress approved December 26, 1941, do hereby proclaim Thursday the twenty-third day of November 1944 a day of national thanksgiving and I call upon the people of the United States to observe it by bending every effort to hasten the day of final victory and by offering to God our devout gratitude for His goodness to us and to our fellow men.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States of America to be affixed.

DONE at the City of Washington this first day of November in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and forty-four and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and sixty-ninth.

By the President:
Franklin Roosevelt

Edward Stettinius Jr.
Acting Secretary of State.

Proclamation – Thanksgiving Day – 1933

 

This is the text of Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933 national Thanksgiving Day Proclamation.

 

Thanksgiving
Day- 1933

By the
President of the United States of America

A
Proclamation

I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do set aside and appoint Thursday, the thirtieth day of November 1933, to be a Day of Thanksgiving for all our people.

proclamation-thanksgiving-day-1933-1

May we on that day in our churches and in our homes give humble thanks for the blessings bestowed upon us during the year past by Almighty God.

May we recall the courage of those who settled a wilderness, the vision of those who founded the Nation, the  steadfastness of those who in every succeeding generation have fought to keep pure the ideal of equality of opportunity and hold clear the goal of mutual help in time of prosperity as in time of adversity.

May we be grateful for the passing of dark days; for the new spirit of dependence one on another; for the closer unity of all parts of our wide land; for the greater friendship between employers and those who toil; for a clearer knowledge by all nations that we seek no conquests and ask only honorable engagements by all people to respect the lands and rights of their neighbors; for the brighter day to which we can win through by seeking the help of God in amore unselfish striving for the bettering of mankind.

In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington this twenty-first day of November, in the year of our Lord
nineteen hundred and thirty-three and of the Independence of the United States
of America the one hundred and fifty-eighth.

Franklin D. Roosevelt.

By the President:

William Phillips,

Acting
Secretary of State.

Sermon – Easter – 1910


Paul Dwight Moody (1849-1947) was the son of famous evangelist Dwight L. Moody, who had first initiated the urban renewal movement and preached revivals across the world. His son served as pastor at South Congregational Church in St. Johnsbury, Vermont from 1912 to 1917. He also served as the 10th president of Middlebury College from 1921 until 1943. This is a transcript of Paul Moody’s Easter Sermon preached in 1910.


 

sermon-easter-1910-1

THE FIRST EASTER SERMON

AN ADDRESS

BY

PAUL DWIGHT MOODY

 

“I have seen the Lord.” – John 20:18, Revised Version.

“I have seen the Lord.” In these words we have the first Easter sermon ever preached. For nineteen centuries since then countless preachers in all the different sects of Christendom have yearly preached their Easter sermons, but the honor of preaching the first Easter sermons belongs to a woman. This was, moreover, in a day when woman held a low place in the estimate of man, and in no corner of the world was she thought much less of than in this very land of Syria. And this woman, Mary of Magdala, was one who had been looked upon with aversion certainly, and possibly with pity, for she had been afflicted with a complaint, the nature of which was so awful whatever it may have been, that she was said to possess seven devils. There was not a single follower of our Lord whom the disciples would not sooner have named as a candidate for the high honor which was ultimately hers, for by all the canons by which they – and we like them – passed judgment she was probably neither spiritual nor even good. According to the Jewish view that suffering was the result of and punishment for sin, Mary was a great sinner or passed for such in their eyes.

How came it then that this woman, despised and neglected until the Master came, should have been ordained the first preacher of the resurrection, and so, in a measure, the first Christian preacher? If we trace the story perhaps we shall see the reason for this.

TRACING THE STORYUpon that first morning of the week, early, when it was yet dark – and dark in more than one sense of the word, for the darkness without was light as compared to the gloom in the hearts of Jesus’ friends – came Mary Magdalene to the tomb. To come she had to conquer all her womanly fears of the darkness, her superstitions – so rank in a Jewish breast – her natural terror in the lonely presence of a tomb. But love had aided her to do this, and she had come through the darkness to Joseph’s tomb to do what little remained of service to the body of her Friend – the One who had brought healing and comfort and happiness into her troubled life. Although now she could make no return for His goodness, show Him no gratitude or sign of devotion, she found relief in being near His grave.

It was the grave of Israel’s hopes. In her confused mind she had taken in but little of His words, but must have shared with His disciples the confident hope that ere long He would restore the kingdom of Israel – He, another David, but undefiled by sin; another Maccabeaus, but tasting no defeat. And now He was resting in a dishonored grave, having drawn no sword, having won no victory and no crown!

It is to her credit that she came at this time when all else had fled, and when He could no longer bring her happiness.

Through the darkness she describes that the stone has been rolled back from the mouth of the tomb. It is not hope which leads her to see this, but despair: and in despair she runs to tell those who have a right to know – the disciples. John and Peter set out for the tomb, and John, the younger perhaps, seems to have outstripped Peter. But at the tomb he pauses, detained perhaps by reverence, perhaps by fear, till Peter, ever impulsive, comes and leaps in. John follows and they find the tomb empty. John, writing his narrative long after, tells us that he “saw and believed.”

Saw and believed what? That Jesus was risen?

Hardly, we think. Two things disprove it: the express statement, “For as yet they knew not the Scripture that He must rise again from the dead,” and then the fact that they went to their homes. Had they believed in anything more than the emptiness of the tomb they could never have returned quietly to their homes.

An empty tomb is an important feature of the resurrection, but it is a small part. That is not the dynamic which sends men and women to the uttermost part of the earth. Christ’s resurrection was to mean infinitely more than an empty tomb. Men to the present day who hunger for certain proof of immortality submit this story to the most microscopic examination by all the canons of historical criticism, and the evidence will always yield one fact – that the tomb was empty; yes, and that its occupant had risen, leaving it of His own volition. But the resurrection is more than this.

Though grief and curiosity carry them to the tomb on the run, they return to their homes puzzled and alarmed when they find the tomb empty. But Mary remains. What caused her to do this is as uncertain as the object of her coming to the grave, unless it was what we may call the unreasonableness of love. She had not followed them into the tomb, nor even now did she enter. But she waited, for here at this spot, barren of all hope and consolation as it seemed, the body of her Lord had last been seen. And her waiting was rewarded, for as she stooped to look through the meager light of the dawning day into the shadowy recesses of the tomb she saw the angel messengers – saw them through the haze of her tears. John and Peter had seen nothing at all. Their curious eyes – even though they entered the tomb – saw nothing but its emptiness and the linen clothes; but the weeping eyes of Mary saw.

Many of us are slow to realize that in the realm of spiritual things there are some truths visible only through the lens of tears. We darken or smoke glass when we desire to look at the brilliance of the sun. In like manner, through our tears we sometimes see things hidden generally from the sight of men. Tears are often telescopes, if you will, bringing near to our sight things otherwise far off; often microscopes, revealing hidden beauty and design in little things which the world calls ugly and coarse and purposeless. The Christian on his knees, we are told, sees further than the philosopher on his housetop. Yes, and the Christian through his tears often sees truths invisible to the keenest sight.

The angels have surprise for Mary’s grief, but they offer her no comfort, for behind her in the background they see One standing, waiting. When His children weep, he Master is always near by. He may be unheeded, but He is not far off.

Never a sigh of passion or of pity,
Never a wail for weakness or for wrong,
Has not its archive in the angels’ city,
Finds not its echo in the endless song.

Not as one blind and deaf to our beseeching,
Neither forgetful that we are but dust,
Not as from heaven too high for our up reaching,
Coldly sublime, intolerably just;

Nay, but Thou knowest us, Lord Christ,
Thou knowest!
Well Thou remeberest our feeble frame!
Thou canst conceive our highest and our lowest
Pulses of nobleness and aches of shame.

 

[The above quotation is from Frederick Myers, St. Paul (London: Macmillan & Co, 1892), p. 15.]

Mary turns at last, thinking the presence of which she is conscious is the gardener’s; so often is He near us that we think it something less. She does not know Him until He speaks her name. But at this sound, sorrow and sighing flee away as clouds before the sun, and in an instant the gloom and darkness of her night of despair are changed into the sunshine of that first glorious Easter morning. And Mary receives her commission – the commission and message which is the certain sign of every true vision or sight of the Lord – and returns to the city which in the darkness she had left with greater darkness in her heart, returns thought the morning sunshine with a great light flooding and warming in her heart. And then in the city, in those glad tidings of the resurrection, she becomes the first preacher of an Easter message.

Let us see, if we can, the meaning of this Easter message of Mary’s. In the first flush of the joy that was hers, Mary little realized all the content and extent of her words. She could not estimate the full significance of what it all meant. Mary’s heart was busier than her brain, and tears of joy doubtless interfered with the process of computing the full importance of the news she carried. Aye, and after nineteen centuries (though from our childhood we have known the story), our hearts give a great bound when we read again these words: “I have seen the Lord,” and realize, however faintly, all that they mean.

Her message meant for one thing that at last Death had found an equal and superior, and had been conquered.

This same Galilean had stood by the grave, and by the power which God had given Him called forth its prey; but now for the first time from within, not by miracle from without, Death had been overcome. For our sakes the sinless Son of God had suffered the defilement of the touch of Death, but suffered only the touch. We naturally, for we owe too much to it, shrink back from imaging how for hours, all unseen, in the desolate shades of the underworld, a struggle has gone on in which all the powers of Hell were taxed to their utmost to keep in the place they had appointed for Him this one quiet Man who alone had resisted their hitherto limitless tyranny. But at the hour set, He passed from their grasp victorious by His own pure sinlessness – passed from the loathsome grip of Death – passed through the great iron doors of Death, leaving them open, forever open, making a broad pathway to life which all who follow Him may tread, leaving His enemies vanquished, prostrate and bound and becoming Himself the first fruits of them that slept, indicating that all the rest of the vast harvest of the sleeping dead belong not to the Evil One but to God. Of this weird and awful struggle He bore no scars (save the nail prints in His hands and the deep wound in His heart) whereby we may recognize Him as our Lord and Master when we see Him. Made perfect through suffering, He has become the Captain of our salvation, and at His shout we will all respond, for He has Himself already for us won the battle.

Again, the resurrection set the seal of God’s approval on the work of Jesus.

Mary doubtless did not realize this in all its fullness, but to us (as in our day we consider all that the resurrection means) it is not the least that it is the earnest of God’s acceptance of the finished work of Jesus. We might not know with the certainty which can be ours that this was the Son of God were it not for the resurrection. We do not derive our belief in Christ’s deity alone from this, but the sure evidence that He rose from the dead places beyond dispute that which our hearts already recognize – that there is a difference between Him and all others. Others have died in behalf of their cause. Others have believed in their mission and found an even readier acceptance of their teaching among the men of their own day, as Mahomet did. Other have, for the time being, seemed just as real to the eyes of their infatuated followers as Jesus did. But Death has put an end to all their claims and pretenses alike. Yet Death, when it touched Him, but recognized its Lord, for He overthrew it.

Great and wonderful as these things are, the resurrection of which Mary was first herald has yet another meaning. It is over this we pause. While the fact that Christ was victorious over the grave may comfort us in sorrow, and the truth that the resurrection is the sign of God’s approval may cheer and strengthen us if distressed by problems in theology, there is yet a more practical aspect to the meaning of the resurrection. For though now and again God causes His children to go through the affliction of bereavement, that which is only of use as comfort at such a time is of limited value as compared with all the resurrection means. The simple statement of Mary: “I have seen the Lord,” meant – though she could hardly have measured all its significance in the first rush of joy – that the historical Jesus of Nazareth had become the Savior of universal experience, and that the matchless Man of the first generation of the Christian era had become Christ of all time. Death had not destroyed Him or taken Him away but had rather freed Him from the shackles of time and place so that He Who in His body could be in but one place, could now be with all men everywhere.

No longer need men travel to find Him, for He is very nigh unto all of them. When Nicodemus came to Jesus that night in Jerusalem, he alone of all that crowded city could enjoy the Master by Himself. Now in palace or in hovel, on the throne or in the dungeon, by day or by night, wherever the heart truly seeks Him, there He may be found. Jesus traveled to the afflicted home of Lazarus for days that to the waiting and sorrowing household seemed endless. Now He stands instantly by the side of the dying and mourner alike. Time and space no longer bind Him. Stone walls are powerless to hold Him, nor can armed guards keep or drive us from His presence. No long and dreary and costly journeys to bring us to His presence in distant Palestine, for “closer is He than breathing, nearer than hands and feet.” Those who have learned the message of Mary by their own experience know the unspeakable preciousness of this very truth – that Jesus lives as much today as ever.

Loud mockers in the roaring street
Say Christ is crucified again;
Twice pierced His Gospel-bearing feet,
Twice broken His great heart in vain.

I hear, and to myself I smile,
For Christ talks with me all the while.

No angle now to roll the stone
From off His unwaking sleep;
In vain shall Mary watch alone,
In vain the soldiers vigil keep.

Yet while they dream my Lord is dead
My eyes are on His shining head.

Ah, never more shall Mary hear
That voice exceeding sweet and low
Within the garden calling clear;
Her Lord is gone, and she must go!

Yet all the while my Lord I meet
In every London lane and street.

Poor Lazarus shall wait in vain,
And Bartimaeus still go blind;
The hearing hem shall ne’er again
Be touched by suffering humankind.

Yet all the while I see them rest,
The poor and outcast, on His breast.

No more unto the stubborn heart
With gentle knocking shall He plead;
No more the mystic pity start,
For Christ twice died is dead indeed.

So in the street I hear men say,
Yet Christ is with me all the day.

 

[Quoted from Robert La Gallienne, The Second Crucifixion]

We will not try to contrast the value of these different meanings of the resurrection, but surely this is not the least of them, that Christ is risen and still walks the earth.

No fable old, no mythic lore,
No dream of bard or seers,
No dead fact stranded on the shore
Of the oblivious years;

But warm, sweet, tender, even yet
A present help is He,
And faith has yet its Olivet,
And love its Galilee.

 

[Quoted from John Greenleaf Whittier, The Poetical Works of John Greenleaf Whittier (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Co, 1886), p. 320, “Our Master.”]

The form of Mary’s sermon interests us. All we know of it is that it was the statement of a fact of personal experience: “I have seen the Lord.” It may have included more, but we doubt it. There is no indication of argument, explanation, or citation of circumstances which might be considered analogous. There are no quotations of Scripture. Nor is there any elaboration of her credibility as a witness. There is only the plain statement of the fact: “I have seen the Lord.”

This is the ideal form of a sermon and is what every sermon shall be – the declaration of a fact – the heralding of the Gospel which is good news. Men are asking, when dead in earnest, for no metaphysical arguments on the possibility of the great facts of our faith, and they are but superficially interested in learned disquisitions on the credibility of the sources of our knowledge, but they do demand a statement of the great facts. The church has had enough, and more than enough, of the lawyer with his pleas and the judge with his decisions, and needs and cries for the witness with his plain declaration. There is a place for discussions of credibility, perhaps, and for psychological arguments and investigations, and the lawyer and the judge have their places in the great temple of Christian truth. But the herald has no call to defend, only to announce; and the ideal sermon is neither apologetic nor a philippic for a decision, but a declaration and invitation – a declaration of the Father’s love and an invitation to the marriage supper of the Lamb.

ALL CHRISTIANSshould be preachers of the resurrection, for it is at the very core of our faith. If Christ rose not, then preaching and faith are alike vain, and of all men are we the most miserable. And though we may not be called upon to herald it in great cathedrals or crowded churches, still by life and word we are to declare that the Lord has risen. Every man or woman who takes upon himself the name of Christ honestly, subscribes to the belief that He rose from the grave and thereby witnesses to that belief. And this we must preach. And if the resurrection is real to us, we will. We must declare that the Lord is risen – that we have seen the Lord. And if we have, we will; for every true vision contains in it that which makes its beholder an evangelist. For the person fresh from contact with the living Lord there is only one thing to do: tell about it. Tell about it he will; the very light on his face would reveal that he had seen the Lord if his lips were dumb.

But inevitable as it is that one who has seen the Lord shall tell about it, it is as impossible for one who has never seen Him to preach this. Many have given intellectual assent to the position that Christ rose, for it can be proven, they feel, by many a process. The resurrection is a fact, but they cannot say: “I have seen the Lord,” and their testimony is powerless. Or it may have been that whereas once they saw Him, it was so long ago that the vision has faded – lost in the clouds and mists that always rise from the lowlands of selfish, useless life. They no longer feel the reality of it. The fact has passed from the forefront to the background of their consciousness.

Yet it is even more than the declaration of a fact from deep conviction. The objective side is here, but the subjective is also here in this great message of Mary’s. “I,” said Mary, “have seen the Lord.”

It is not the statement that the Lord has risen, great that would be; nor is it the declaration, however earnest, that others have seen Him. It is no second-hand information that Mary brings. Her own personality is enwrapped in the message.

It is a great and blessed thing to declare our conviction of certain truths which we have never, perhaps, ourselves experienced, but such declarations carry but small weights compared with the message linked to our personality. It may do some good to others to say that he, or she, or someone else has had a vision of the Lord, but if we would make Him real to others – would prove to others that He yet walks the earth and may be known to men – we must say:

“I have seen the Lord.”

If we take our stand, unashamed, by our experience, then our experience becomes real to the world about us. Let us but be untrue to a vision, and the world will doubt the truth and reality of that vision. This is worthy of emphasis, for the one thing this world hungers for is certain conviction that that which it hopes for is really so. Over and over again the question is asked:

“Do you believe what you are saying when you declare sublime truths? Are you sure? Have you seen the Lord?”

Tell a needy and a dying world that the Lord of love is not dead but here in our midst; and that you yourself know of His presence not because of a father’s, or mother’s, or a pastor’s conviction of this point, but because you yourself have come into living contact with Him – have seen Him – and hope will kindle in despairing hearts and men will rise up to serve God and be new men, saved by reason of your vision.

Why was it that of the generation which is passing, few men every preached so meaningly and so powerfully as one who always called himself “an old bum”? He had but one message. His was no efficiency gained in college or seminary. Sometimes he was tempted to imitate other men a little, and to preach conventionally, but at such times he was always ill at ease until he threw over such attempts and made his way back to the old facts he was familiar with, and told again how the Lord came to him as he sat ding on a beer keg in a saloon, how He came to him and saved him. Sam Hadley had seen the Lord, and said so; and though we might hear that story again and again it never failed to touch the heart and make Christ real, as many an able discourse or learned exposition was powerless to do. [Sam Hadley became a famous missionary to the down and out in New York. In 1870, he had been fired from his job and became an alcoholic. Later when in jail, he reported that he saw demons telling him to kill himself, but he also heard Jesus saying, “pray.” Pray he did, asking for Jesus to have mercy on him. When Sam was released from jail, he went to his brother’s house and attended church with him. At that service in 1882, he committed his life to Christ, and four years later he became the Superintendent of the Water Street Mission, where he had earlier committed his own life to Christ. Sam held that post until his death in 1906.]

This is what the world needs – men and women to whom the great fact is that they have seen the Lord. This is what we must tell the world. We need not theorize or argue. The world cares little for our theories and less for our arguments, but it is hungry for a knowledge of Him and for the certain assurance that He is knowable.

HOW MANY GAINED THIS VISION.It is important and helpful for us to see how Mary gained this vision, and thus won the high honor of being the first Easter preacher. Whenever a man or a woman has preeminently been gained through some experience or another which we may hold in part accountable for the message. Great heights are never gained without a struggle, and when a man or woman sees further than those about him, or sees more deeply or clearly, it is because of something added which is the others did not have.

What accounts for Mary’s keeper sight?

Her saintliness?

Whatever we make of the expression “seven devils,” we know that it was an affliction which must have led in those days, when all suffering was felt to be the result of sin, to her ostracism. Some would have us think it has a mental significance and that Mary, till she met our lord, was afflicted with epilepsy, or was insane, or a mental degenerate. Others, that it has a moral significance and that Mary was a moral degenerate and without the pale of society; hence has come the meaning of “Magdalene” which properly means merely an inhabitant of the village of Magdala. Whatever the meaning of the expression, however, whether Mary was a mental or moral degenerate, she was probably the last person the twelve would have chosen, or even thought of, for this high honor. The scribes and Pharisees would have shunned her as a leper, and the priests would have drawn aside their white robes as they passed her lest they should be defiled by the accursed thing.

So it could not have been her social position or her influence which secured her this honor. The little village of Magdala from which she came lives in our recollection only as Domremy [the village where Joan the Arc was much later born, around 1412], for instance, for the daughter to whom it gave birth.

It could hardly have been brilliance of intellect. This simple peasant woman doubtless could not read or write, and it is improbably that she knew anything of the law or the prophets. She was, in short, of all women the most unlikely for this position it would seem.

But she had one claim, and that the best. She loved. Love for this Man who could no longer do aught for her had brought her to the tomb when the disciples and all others had gone to their homes. Maternal love is strong, but the Virgin had left the lonely tomb. The love of a strong man for his friend will bear much, but the loving John and the devoted Peter had gone back to the city. Mary stayed on. We have said it was unreasonable; and in a worldly sense it was. But, reason or folly, love bound her to the spot where last she had seen the body of her Lord. No hope had dawned in her breast. Faith, too, in all but His goodness would seem to have disappeared. A greater than she was later to write that faith and hope are two of the very great things, but that love is greater than either of these. And love has outlasted faith and hope, and here, as so often, proved itself the greatest and most enduring.

Aye and when prophecy her tale hath finished,
Knowledge hath withered from the trembling tongue,
Love shall survive, and love be undiminished,
Love be imperishable, love be young.

Love was believing, and the best is truest;
Love would hope ever, and the trust was gain;
Love that endured shall learn that Thou renewest;
Love, even Thine, O Master, with Thy pain!

 

[Quoting from Frederick Myers, St. Paul (London: Macmillan & Co, 1892), pp. 29-30.]

There are some who will not listen to this sermon of Mary’s. For them indeed He is dead.

For hence he lies
In the lorn Syrian town,
And on his grave with shining eyes
The Syrian stars look down.

 

[Quoting from Matthew Arnold, New Poems (London: Macmillan, 1867), “Obermann Once More”.]

For such, death is and ever must be the inscrutable mystery. Easter brings to such no uplift and no joy. For them we must have the profoundest pity.

There are others for whom the resurrection is real, who admit it as a fact and know that in it they find the proof of their own resurrection and the credential of the efficacy of the work of Jesus. Yet, nevertheless, in their hearts there is no sermon like Mary’s. They must say: “The Lord has risen,” or “Such an one has seen Him,” but they have not seen Him; they cannot say: “I have seen.”

We know very well that we are gifted and trained beyond Mary, that we are endowed with more insight, that we have all the right to preach that she had; yet upon our lips the words have a hollow ring when we declare this truth. We affirm that we have seen Him; yet we have no such message as Mary’s which may send us out with speedy feet to share with others the glad news. The reason for it is that we have not seen Him through the eyes of love. We have not loved enough. It was love that first unlocked the fact of the resurrection. It was love which was the force that spurred Mary on and which was her commission.

Surely this is a glorious and a comforting doctrine. We are not gifted, perhaps, and may have no talents, or certainly no great ones. Birth and circumstance may have forever closed to us certain avenues of service. We are cut off from any hope of being of service to God along certain lines. We are not even good by our own weak standards, to say nothing of the higher standard of God of which we hardly dare to think. Yet, as followers of Christ and believers in the resurrection, we are called upon to be preachers of it. The one supreme qualification which we may have is love. Through love we will discover those things which the Spirit reveals to those who love Him, and not only will we gain our message through love but by love will we be empowered to preach it. Love was the sum substance of the first great Easter sermon, and since that day it has always been the first qualification of the preacher, and the essential part of every Easter message.

Sermon – Memorial Day


A Brief History of Memorial Day

On May 5, 1868, Major General John A. Logan of the Grand Army of the Republic (an organization made up of Union Veterans) set aside May 30th as Decoration Day to commemorate fallen soldiers by adorning their graves with flowers. General Logan’s order declared: “We should guard their graves with sacred vigilance….Let pleasant paths invite the coming and going of reverent visitors and fond mourners. Let no neglect, no ravages of time, testify to the present or to the coming generations that we have forgotten as a people the cost of a free and undivided republic.”

That year, 5,000 gathered at Arlington National Cemetery to attend commemoration ceremonies presided over by General and Mrs. Ulysses S. Grant. This was the nation’s first major tribute to those who fell in the Civil War, and at that time small American flags were placed on each grave (a tradition that continues today).

However, the decoration of graves actually began before General Logan’s official order, and some two dozen locations claim to be the site of the first Memorial Day observance. The majority of these sites are in the South, where most of the casualties of the Civil War are buried.

For example, both Macon and Columbus, Georgia, as well as Richmond, Virginia, each claim to have begun Memorial Day in 1866; and Boalsburg, Pennsylvania, claims that it held the first observance in 1864. However, one of the first documented sites to hold a tribute to the Civil War dead took place in Columbus, Mississippi on April 25, 1866. A group of women who were placing flowers on the graves of Confederate soldiers (casualties of the battle at Shiloh) noticed the destitute graves of the Union soldiers and also decorated their graves with flowers. The first community-wide observance occurred in Waterloo, New York, on May 5, 1866, with a ceremony to honor local Civil War veterans. (A century later in 1966, President Lyndon Baines Johnson and Congress declared Waterloo to be the “birthplace” of Memorial Day because of that earlier observance.)

By the end of the 19th century, the observance of May 30th as a day to honor the Civil War dead had become a widespread practice across the nation, but after World War I, the tribute was expanded to include all American military men and women who had died in any war. Memorial Day has been acknowledged as a national holiday since 1971, when an Act of Congress established its observance on the last Monday in May.

In 2000, Congress passed the “The National Moment of Remembrance Act,” asking all Americans to pause at 3 p.m. local time on Memorial Day for a minute of silence in remembrance of all those who have died in military service to America.


 

THE INVISIBLE ARMY

And Elisha prayed, and said, “Lord, I pray Thee, open his eyes, that he may see.” And the Lord opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw; and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.– 2 Kings VI,17.

The Psalmist has beautifully said, “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble” [Psalm 46:1]. The text refers to one of these wonderful instances of Providential care so often repeated in the history of the Israelitish people and so often experienced by individuals and nations since the days of the prophets. Israel was surrounded by merciless foes determined upon her destruction. Now the Syrians were encamped against them and formed their ambuscades at various places, expecting to entrap and cut them off. Elisha the prophet, Divinely inspired, discovered their hiding places and kept his master informed of their movements.

So often had the schemes of the enemy been defeated that the king of Syria, exasperated and puzzled, imagined that a traitor in his own camp had disclosed his secrets. But one of his servants said, “None, my lord, O king, but Elisha that is in Israel, telleth the king of Israel the words that thou speakest in thy bed-chamber” [2 Kings 6:12]. The prophet was at Dothan, which the Syrians, in haste, besieged by night so as to cut off his retreat. But a greater than Elisha was there; the Lord Jehovah had sent the invisible armies of the skies to occupy the mountain and protect His servant from all harm. When the morning dawned and the servant of Elisha saw the armed hosts of the Syrians, he said to his master, in great alarm, “Alas! How shall we do?” Calm and undisturbed at the formidable array, Elisha prayed that the young man’s eyes should be opened. When, behold, the mountain gleamed with the splendor of armed hosts of horsemen and chariots of fire. Then was revealed to the young man the great truth which all the world should know – that all the armies of earth are powerless before the armies of heaven.

The prophet prayed once more and blindness came upon the Syrian hosts so that the man they came to destroy led them to a distant city and into the presence of the king and the armies of the enemies upon whom they came to make war. Truly, they who have their trust in God “abide under the shadow of the Almighty” and He becomes to them a refuge and a fortress.

The Christian believes in God’s protecting presence, and through that faith his life becomes a life of obedience and trust. As the daylight fades and the shadows of night gather round him, the child of God commends himself to his Father’s care and within the hollow of the Almighty hand slumbers sweetly, peacefully, and safely. As the darkness flees before the rosy light of breaking day, he offers up his prayer of thanksgiving and sings his song of rejoicing. With renewed faith and purpose he submits his strength and will to Divine guidance, and leaning upon the strong arm of the Lord of Hosts, fearlessly marches into the battle of life.

The text contains an encouraging lesson of God’s Providence and care for His people. No truth is more forcibly taught upon the page of history than that of a nation’s exaltation through righteousness and its reproach because of sin [Proverbs 14:34]. Sacred and profane history alike are but the startling records of the rise and fall of nations – records that are emphasized by the splendid ruins which strew the earth and which tell alike of great exaltation and still greater humiliation – which tell of life and growth under the sunshine of truth, or death and decay under the blasting influences of transgression. The Tigris and Euphrates, the Nile, the Mediterranean, and the islands of the see, the mountains and valleys and the plains of earth – all bear witness that sin has been a vortex into which the highest civilizations have been thrown and have forever been swallowed up. God goes before the people and the nation which march along the highways of righteousness, guiding them by His pillar of fire at night and His cloud of protection by day [Exodus 13:21], so long as they acknowledge the directing Hand and trust the Divinity that shines from the fire and conceals itself in the clouds. By direction of the Almighty, the children of Israel escaped from Egyptian bondage. They crossed the Red Sea between the miraculously sustained walls of water. They saw their pursuing enemies enter the narrow path from which their own hosts had just safely emerged and they saw the water close over chariot and riders forever; but the power that moved the protecting and avenging hand was to them unseen. God was with His people and in His own mysterious way directed the hidden power which was to accomplish His purposes. The Lord had indeed triumphed, for His people had not been required to strike a single blow in their own defense. The hand that had placed the pillar of cloud between pursuer and pursued and that had closed the waters over Egypt’s mightiest chieftains was unseen by both foeman and friend. When in the reign of the good Hezekiah, the Assyrians came against Israel, the destroying angel passed over their camp at night and smote a hundred fourscore and five thousand of their bravest warriors [2 Kings 19:35].

There are no foes harder to battle with than those we cannot see – there are no forces more difficult to contend against than those which cannot be brought within the limits of our sight. We cannot estimate the numbers of such a foe – we cannot detect his movements nor calculate how we may avert or counteract his blow. Against such a presence we are helpless and defenseless. The storm rages above us, the thunder terrifies us, while the play of the forked lighting seems searching us in every hiding place. The muffled rumble of the earthquake and the trembling soil beneath our feet startles us out of all propriety and reason, while we add to our fears and to the real danger a thousand misgivings that are purely imaginary. The pestilence that walks in the darkness and invades our land bears consternation upon its wings and we cry out, “Whither shall we fly from its dreadful presence?” [from C. H. Spurgeon’s “What Was Become of Peter?,” Sword and Trowel (August 1873).]

Alarm takes possession of our nature; our very humanity seems to desert us, and we fly from our neighbors and from friends and from loved ones, hoping in our selfishness to secure some health-protected spot where we may be safe. Ah! how in the recognized presence of the invisible we forget that He who keepeth Israel never slumbers or sleeps [Psalm 121:4], and that we shall trust Him in the darkness as well as in the light. He has said, “I will not fail thee or forsake thee” [Joshua 1:5]. The Christian’s faith is that which trusts the Unseen Power which lies behind all open manifestation. No matter what threatens, he knows God will send His protecting angels to keep charge over him. What is history but the recorded result of these invisible forces? The books that fill our libraries contain only some small fragments of the world’s unnumbered wrecks which have been saved from the vortex of that oblivion which has swallowed up all the rest. The chronologist computes his time by fragments – periods, as we call them, intervening between great historical events – measurements of tie made up of the rise and fall of empires and republics, interspersed with the life and death of kings and warriors, and stained by blood and crime. The ruins of past greatness, which tell the sad story of glory and shame, for centuries have cast their gloom upon many of the loveliest spots of the earth. We may ask what and where were the forces that caused all this desolation? Why did not one historical period- or even one generation – profit by the misfortunes of its predecessor? History points to the physical forces – the ambitions and passions of men – but is almost silent as to the unseen influences which excited the ambition and stirred the passions which struck the blow. Man was in the destroying wind, the earthquake, and the fire, but God was in the still small voice which pronounced the doom of disobedience and sin. History heard the din of battle but failed to recognize the Mysterious Power which directed the issue.

Nations come and go; they rise and fall. Like human life, they seem born only to a short existence – to run their course and die. It is a serious question for the statesman of the present to consider how long our government shall stand: what causes shall contribute to its permanence, or what causes shall lead to its overthrow.

How few years (as we compute them) has even the oldest nation of the day existed under its present form of government? Progress, in its triumphant march over the earth, is ever dissipating political fallacies, destroying effete [worn out] forms, and establishing new principles. Man is being slowly lifted to higher planes. The divinity is stirring within him, opening his eyes and removing the blindness which hid from him the invisible forces which, under God, are at his command. With us – and with what we do for the future – rest largely the responsibilities of a free government, trusting its life and its all to the masses of the people who, irrespective of condition or race, direct its destinies by a free and unrestricted ballot.

From innumerable circumstances in our history we believe that we are highly favored of heaven. If Israel was chosen as the pioneer of a higher civilization, of a purer morality, and as the law giver of the world – if Greece was chosen as the exemplar of aesthetic culture and as a teacher if the arts – if England became the stronghold of aggressive Christianity – so the United States is destined to embrace all these and to become an example of still further advancement. Surely God is with us, and “they that be with us are more than they that be with them” [2 Kings 6:16]. From the time that civilization first planted its standard at Jamestown down to the present hour, the mountains round about us have been filled with the invincible hosts of Jehovah. The Spirit that calmed the waves and stilled the tempestuous winds on Galilee has hovered over our waters; our land has been hallowed by the footsteps of Him who went about doing good [Acts 10:38], and our homes have been sanctified by the sweet spirit of Bethany.

Today we look backwards upon our history with wonder and with gratitude to God. We look forward to a destiny that will bring the kingdoms of this earth and the kingdom of heaven into closer communion. Our tongues break into song and our souls into thanksgiving as we contemplate the mercies which have been our lot. When dangers threatened relief was always near. When discouragement came to our people, the heavens opened in brightness above us and the bow of promise spanned the continent. When uncertainty clouded our governmental course, the superior intelligence of our statesmen always provided a safe solution of the problem. The course of empire upon this Western continent has never been checked…. The fierce contests over boundary lines raised up a hardy and valiant race, destined for yeoman services in the future. The political disputes with the old country which claimed our allegiance, sharpened the wits of the people, gave wisdom to our magistrates, influence to our legislators, and developed those peculiar ideas of government which have made us most advanced of nations.

The War of the Revolution determined and settled our political status among the peoples of the earth. The confederacy, which followed the Declaration of Independence, demonstrated the weakness of the foundation upon which we expected to build. The Constitution of 1789 welded the states together into an unbroken and unending chain of common interest. The War of 1812 strengthened our national bond, unified the people, and proved to the world our ability to maintain our rights. The War of the Rebellion abolished slavery, made our soil free, and forever destroyed the idea of secession as a Constitutional right. The return of peace and the organization of the Grand Army of the Republic crystallized American loyalty into a gem of clearest ray and unclouded beauty. Step by step we have ascended the heights which no other nation has reached. A mighty republic has grown upon the foundation of unrestricted and universal suffrage [right to vote], refuting the fallacy that men trusted with a free ballot could never govern wisely and well. The experience of one hundred and twenty-nine years has shown that, with as many conflicting interests as there are states, all may be harmonized by wise legislation and a just administration of the law. If a partisan Congress or unjust judges should decide otherwise, the people will rectify the impropriety peacefully at the ballot box. The invisible power of wholesome public opinion will always prove a conservative force among a God-fearing people. As the blood of relationship holds together the various branches of the family, so the relationship of the states creates a common interest in the welfare of all. Yea, more than this – the mingled blood of American patriotism, partaken in solemn communion by the soil of every commonwealth in defense of the whole, would cry out from the ground to heaven against any attempt at the life of our system of government. Surely the graves of our fallen comrades would form a rampart behind which their invisible spirits would forever keep guard over an unsevered Union.

Today in this memorial service, we remember our beloved died for their part in the solution of the great problems of humanity. Not only did they freely offer themselves upon their country’s altar – a sacrifice for the great interests of the present – but by their blood they became the oracle and prophet of the future. They denounced and defeated the severance of national bonds, pronounced the doom of rebellion, freed the bondsman from his chains, and predicted the coming of a national greatness which, if not already here, is rapidly upon the way. Every day should be the benediction of the morrow. Every generation should store up blessings for the next. We bless the past for its lesson of experience, and we revere the memories of the men who made the past a glorious prediction for the future. So we come on this Memorial Day to record our indebtedness to the patriotic soldiers, pay our homage for their bravery, express our sympathy with their sufferings, and our admiration for their achievements, pledging ourselves to stand loyally by the institutions for which they nobly died.

As we gather on this day – to us a day of sad and pleasant memories, a day of instructive retrospect and of profitable anticipation for a glorious future – we meet with our dead here in this quiet God’s acre, there in National Cemeteries, or perhaps far away in lonely and forgotten spots where friendly hands have never strewn flowers. From all these hallowed places- yea, even from the depths of the sea – our dead comrades keep watch over the nation’s honor. We are here today, a grateful multitude, to pay such a tribute as we can to the heroes who did so much for us. We strew flowers of beauty upon their grassy mounds and speak words of love and kindly remembrance; we shed tears of sorrow for the departed and express words of sympathy for the bereaved as though but yesterday they had passed out of our sight. We seem today to live over again the eventful past. We hear again the bugle call echoing over the hills; we see the sad partings and the long farewells; victory and defeat, bereavement and earth, all pass before us in review. Our spirits hold communication with the comrades of long ago. We know that in the body they will not again answer roll call this side of the Pearly Gates, but their influence will live until the reveille of the resurrection morning shall bid them rise for the great review.

“Here rest the great and good. Here they repose
After their generous toil. A sacred band,
They take their sleep together, while the year
Comes with its earliest flowers to deck their graves,
And gathers them again as winter frowns.
Theirs is no vulgar sepulcher, – green sods
Are all their monument, and yet it tells
A nobler history than pillared piles
Or the eternal pyramids.

They need
No statue nor inscription to reveal
Their greatness. It is round them, and the joy
With which their children tread the hallowed ground
That holds their venerated bones, the peace
That smiles on all they fought for, and the wealth
That clothes the land they rescued – these, though mute
As feeling ever is when deepest – these
Are monuments more lasting than the fanes
Reared to the kings and demigods of old.

Let these elms
Bend their protecting shadow o’er their graves,
And build with their green roof the only fane,
Where we may gather on this hallowed day
That rose to them in blood, and set in glory.
Here let us meet, while our motionless lips
Give not a sound, and all around is mute
In the deep Sabbath of a heart too full
For words or tears – here let us strew the sod
With the fresh flowers of spring, and make to them
An offering of the plenty Nature gives,
And they have rendered ours – perpetually.”

 

[Quoted from James G. Percival’s “The Graves of the Patriots,” in Samuel Kettell, Specimens of American Poetry: With Critical and Biographical Notices (Boston: S.G. Goodrich & Co, 1829), Vol. III, pp 46-47.]

We have many more graves to decorate today than one year ago. In our own state [Pennsylvania], over a thousand of our comrades have been gathered by the grim reaper – Death. There will be more next year, and still more in the years that shall follow. As these mounds multiply, the early roll call shortens, and yet as the years roll by, those who survive will still come to decorate the graves, and when the last comrade shall have received his honorable discharge, the lessons of Memorial Day will still be remembered – they will never die.

It has been said that the particular genius of this memorial season is that while other holidays praise institutions, this glorifies men, honors the private citizens and the seemingly obscure soldier. Walter Scott described Old Mortality as going through the cemeteries of Scotland, chiseling anew upon the tombstones the names that time had well nigh obliterated [from Sir Walter Scott’s “Old Morality,” in Tales of My Landlord (Edinburgh: 1816), Vols. II-IV]. Asked to explain his zeal for the memory of these worthies, the old man replied that he wished to see the heroes of yesterday march forward side by side with the youth of today. That nation suffers a great calamity whose children and youth have separated themselves from yesterday’s battlefields and victories and have forgotten to honor the memories of their fathers – the sages and statesmen from whom they have received a priceless heritage.

I thank God that loyalty to flag and country is still the countersign [a military watchword]. It is related that an old emperor was dying. He had been a father to his people and had loved and cared form them as his children. The burden upon his heart was the destiny of his country; and what, when he was gone, should become of all that he had established for the good of his people? To give him assurance that all would be cared for when he was no more, there passed in review before him the brave officers who had led his armies and the veterans who had been the heroes of many a hard-fought battle. Upon their banners was inscribed, “We are loyal to our emperor and will be loyal to his country.” “Yes,” said the emperor, “they have been loyal and true to me, and I could trust my government to their care, but they are growing old and like me will soon be gone, and then who shall care for my country?” Further to assure him of his country’s safety there came before his review an army of stalwart young men, the pride and flower of the land. They were the noble sons of the veterans who had just passed, and carried on their banners the legend. “We follow in our fathers’ steps, and will be loyal to king and country.” “Yes,” said the emperor, “I could die in peace and trust the country to the worthy sons of such noble sires, but alas! They too, will soon be gone, and after them what will become of the land?” Following after the young men and stepping quickly to the tap of the drum, came the vast army of the boys of the empire, bearing their banners, “Our fathers have taught us patriotism and we will be loyal to our country and live and die for its best interests.” “There,” said the emperor, “I am content and die happy; a country built up by such loyal veterans, supported by such noble sons, and who are to be followed by such patriotic children, can never be overturned by revolution and will never die.” This lesson is for us today. History records your loyal and heroic service; and many of your sons, imbued with your spirit, have within the past year gone forth with the same ardent patriotism, to die, if need be, for their country’s honor; and their children have been marching to the music of the Union and have been taught to love and revere the old flag for which their grandfathers fought.

In the springtime when the flowers come to their resurrection after their long slumber – when the birds, after their winter’s silence, wake to their melody of song – when the world is bright with renewed life, we remember our dead, and they come forth to meet us not only in precious memory as we knew them long ago but they come in the developed and perfected work for which their death laid the foundation and of which their blood wrote the prediction. They come in the realization of the great truths for which their lives were given – they come in the broader and nobler patriotism which has resulted from their deeds – they come in the felt presence of their spirits in the very atmosphere which surrounds us.

This is a government founded upon intelligence, and can only be perpetuated by virtue. We trust the franchise [vote] to the evil and the good alike. We can draw no distinction between vice and virtue at the ballot box. The responsibility of the choice of proper administrators is thrown upon the body politic; it becomes an education in fidelity and time has proved that, in the main, the trust has not been misplaced. It is true that mistakes are made and frauds are perpetrated, but they form the exception to the rule. Mercenary men sometimes obtaining positions of great trust; incompetent men are appointed to offices which require skill that they cannot give; and unworthy men are often elevated to posts of honor which they do not adorn. But these are not proofs of the inadequacy of the system; they but show that the work of evangelization is not universal and that political education among the masses is incomplete. To the man of integrity, however ignorant, the burden is an incentive to higher duties and nobler aims. The defects are not of the system but of our want of a proper appreciation of its privileges – they show that we, who ought to be foremost in citizenship, have done our whole duty.

To the Christian people of this country, the broad and humanizing advantages of republicanism ought to be incentives to more virtuous activity and stimulants to higher patriotic requirements in our politics – they should be to the goodness and intelligence of the country an earnest pledge for the redemption of the ballot from unholy contamination. Let absolute truth (and that embraces all that is righteous in governments and in men) be the grand ideal that this nation shall hold up before the world. Call it an idea, if you will, and then with the characteristics earnestness of men who are convinced of its value, let us press it home to hearts and lives of the American people. Ideas are the forces that move the world; they are invisible armies that discomfit the material hosts of folly, vice, and ignorance; they are the horseman and the chariots of fire which gather round the prophets and conservators of civil purity and which send dismay into the ranks of the political tricksters and jugglers and gradually cause the unworthy and incompetent to hide themselves away from public sight. They have caused revolutions and formed new governments; they have swayed the millions and have made social life to leap forward with a single bound into higher and healthier conditions. This republic was the offspring of an idea – the conviction that the people who were to be governed could best govern themselves independent of hereditary rulership or autocratic dictatorship; the idea that the convinced judgment of the masses – the voice of the people – expressed to the largest extent the will of God concerning us.

That is our political faith today, but we also believe that we cannot reach or maintain a standard worthy of a free people unless we elevate our ideas of public morality for the masses and of private virtues for our representatives. The State wants:

“Men – high-minded men,
With powers as far above dull brutes endued…
As beasts excel cold rocks and brambles rude;
Men who their duties know,
And knowing, dare maintain.”

 

[From Sir William Jones’ “An Ode In Imitation of Alcaeus,” excerpt published in The New York Times, December 23, 1871.]

Whatever the world may say, and however infidelity or skepticism may determine, the civil world is indebted to Christianity for its wonderful progress.

Christ, the Exemplar, whilst the originator of new ideas for human conduct, was also the collection of many of the old and useful which had been abused and misapplied. For the doctrines of revenge and retaliation, He gave us that of forgiveness of injuries. For the cure of dissensions and unhappy differences, He gave us due consideration for the opinions of others. For social wrongs, He gave us purity of life. For the peace of the state, He gave us respect for magistrates and rulers and obedience to the laws. For civil progress, He gave us trust in God and brotherly kindness in our daily intercourse with men. He restrained our evil tendencies by a reiteration of the Ten Commandments. He softened our natures by the Beatitudes and enlarged our lives and increased our hopes by the new commandments that He gave us. He taught us the wondrous idea of love with the Divine assurance that it was the all-powerful principle for good – “the fulfilling of the law” [Romans 13:10]. How the cross, as the emblem of that Christianity, has been revered and loved throughout the civilized world!

The Christian world of the nineteenth century is a far better world than that of the Jew or Roman two thousand years ago. Humanity stands upon a higher platform – human rights are conceded by the rulers, respected by the people, and enforced and protected by the laws as never before in the history of human government. Liberty, not only in thought and action but in self-government, has given men higher conception of individual duty and has drawn their hearts nearer to each other. The cross has carried with it the idea of redemption and has given inspiration to the hope of Heaven after the troubles and cares of this life have passed away. This invisible force, like the march of a victorious army, has passed from conquering to conqueror and still like an avalanche continues to gather strength as it moves forward. It has marched over the boundary line into the new century and with increasing ranks will carry the whole world toward the millennial year, when God’s kingdom shall come and His will shall be done upon the earth. It is an idea that has fought its way against darkness and prejudice – against foes both visible and invisible; but it has made its citadel in the hearts and homes and lives of the people, and it is still triumphant.

Another of the forces which fill the atmosphere and the mountains about us is the idea of our nationality. One country, one people, one flag, is our motto. Possibly the thought of secession or disunion has passed forever; we cannot part company without losing strength and influence; we can never sever our Union without becoming a reproach to the world; we cannot multiply flags without national shame and humiliation. That grand old banner, since the day when its first star was attached and all its stripes were bound together, has commanded respect and admiration upon all the waters of the globe. Resplendent and beautiful as the tints of the dawning morning, it has reflected the rays of the rising sun of freedom through all the sky, from the heavens above to the earth beneath. For more than a century it has attracted the weary toilers of the earth. The very thought of it – its name, its magnificent presence – have carried to the minds of millions the ides of liberty: liberty of conscience, liberty of citizenship, liberty of noble manhood; the right to the labor of one’s own hand, to the product of one’s own accumulation, the right of the man to own himself, the right of education for his children, the privileges of equality with other men, and the right of protection against oppression.

In the midst of some great public excitement or fancied peril, we ask, “Is the country really in danger?” Are these popular strikes a menace to our institutions? Do these vast local interests which, in their selfishness rise up in threatening attitudes, mean mischief to the whole fabric? Will a mercenary Congress ever barter our rights away for ambition or lucre [money]? Will the American people ever yield willingly to their own humiliation? We look about us and ask as did the servant of the prophet, “Alas! How shall we do?” But when your eyes shall be opened and we shall behold the horsemen and the chariots of fire – the great innumerable hosts of the skies, hidden from our natural eyes, we will be led to answer, “God is with us, and they that are with us are greater than they that be with them.” We will not fear when we see these unnumbered detachments armed with the potent influences of the great ideas of which I have spoken. When we behold among the standards of that vast gathering the banner of the cross inscribed with Christ’s new commandment and the spirits of our dead pointing to that as the life of our American institutions- when we see our own national flag bearing aloft the motto, “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof” [Leviticus 25:10] – when we see here the banner of a free ballot, and there the banner of constitutional security, and in the front of that great array a fortress of the graves of those who fought and died for the liberties we enjoy, we need not fear for the future, for God is with us.

Against all these threatening dangers there are safeguards, and we must see to it that they are found and applied… We should have our churches increased a thousand times – have them conducted by a loyal and Godly ministry, and have them supported by an honest and patriotic membership. We should bring to the work of evangelization an aggressive piety that will pursue sin and vice of every description into every stronghold and give them uncompromising battle at every step. We want the spirit that drove the money changers from the temple, that rebuked sin in high places, and that administered punishment to the wrongdoer without favor; the spirit that, upon the other hand, forgave the repentant sinner and in love invited the weary ones of earth to come to Him and find rest.

And so on this Memorial Day we must not forget the sources from which have come these national blessings. We go back in our history and thank God for the Puritan spirit and for that deliverance from religious oppression which brought to our shores the Mayflower and its heroic company who sought upon our soil freedom to worship God. We are thankful, too, for the prayer and song which hallowed Plymouth – a prayer whose strains still linger upon the New England air and will forever be wafted upon the winds back and forth to the utmost boundaries of our Union.

We are thankful that the spirit which came in the Mayflower still lives. How quickly its influence established peace after the [Civil] War (in which so many of our comrades fell) was over. How it bridged the frightful charms with the olive branch and took back to its forgiving bosom the erring ones, and restored peaceful relations with the discordant states.

Under the same influence the victorious armies of the North settled down to peaceful avocations and the hostile camp was transformed into the fraternal spirit of the Grand Army of the Republic. As again we thank God for His blessings to our country, we drop a tear of kindly remembrance over the graves of our dead, believing that in the great multitude of the invisible, their spirits will be with us to warn and guard us from all dangers which may threaten us.

Comrades beloved, may the God of peace that brought from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work to do His will, working in you that which is well pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to Whom be glory forever and ever. Amen. [Hebrews 13:21]

Sermon – Pilgrims – 1820


Sermon preached by Joel Mann in Plymouth on December 22, 1820.


sermon-pilgrims-1820


A DISCOURSE

DELIVERED IN BRISTOL, DECEMBER 22, 1820

ON THE

ANNIVERSARY OF THE LANDING OF OUR

ANCESTORS

AT PLYMOUTH

BY JOEL MANN

COLLEAGUE PASTOR OF The Catholic Congregational Church

WARREN

Printed By S. Randall
1821

 

No apology need be offered for this discourse. The event which occasioned it must ever be held in grateful remembrance by all the real friends of religious liberty.

Should any consider this as an attack upon any denomination of Christians among us, they will do injustice to the motives and feelings of the author. This discourse has no reference to any sect in this country besides our own.

We consider that it is exceedingly important to cultivate the exercise of Christian charity. But, is it quite charitable to refuse us the privilege of speaking in support of the principles which we do most sincerely and conscientiously believe to accord with the gospel; and which our fathers have transmitted to us at the expense of everything dear to them in life? Be it known to all men, that, so long as we stand on the soil of New-England—the land which embosoms the ashes of our holy fathers, it is our absolute incontrovertible, right to maintain those principles. There is no set of men on earth that has any right to interfere or object to our doing it whenever we please.

Most cordially would we embrace in Christian fellowship all who love the Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity; and rejoice in all the prosperity of Zion.

In regard to the style of this discourse, the author has nothing to say, except it was a hurried production of two or three days labour in the midst of other duties and cares.

DISCOURSE

Psalm 44; 1, 2. We have heard with our ears, O God, our fathers have told us, what work thou didst in their days in times of old. How thou didst drive out the heathen with thy hand, and plantedest them; how thou didst afflict the people, and cast them out.

I Kings 8: 57, 58. The Lord our God be with us, as he was with our fathers: let him not leave us, nor forsake us; that he may incline our hearts unto him, to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and his statutes, and his judgments, which he commanded his fathers.

This day completes the second century since our pious forefathers landed in this western world, and began a settlement at the town of Plymouth. This was an event of great importance to the cause of religion, and the civil rights of man. It was an event which calls on us for gratitude to that gracious being who was their guide and Protector. It was an event which commenced a new era in the annals of history; an era presenting new and interesting features in civil & religious polity; an era, which witnessed a reformation in the Church of Christ, and a return to its primitive form—its apostolick simplicity. It was an event which laid the foundation for our religious liberty. The kind Shepherd of Israel brought out our fathers from oppressions more intolerable than those of Egypt; and planted them hers, that they might enjoy that purity of worship which was instituted by Christ and his apostles.

My design in the following remarks is to give a simple statement of facts, showing the causes why the first settlers of New-England left their native country, and came to this part of the world. And also to take a view of their first establishment in what was then a lonely wilderness. What may be stated on this very interesting subject, I have drawn from the authentick histories of that age.

Let me premise particularly, that nothing, which will be presented in this discourse, is intended to bring any reproach on any denomination of Christians among us. Indeed, all the difficulties, to which we may allude, were difficulties in the Church of England; and all her persecutions were persecutions of their own members. The non-conformists were her own ministers, and her own members.

1. The Cause of the removal of our fathers to this section of the world was, unwillingness on their part to confirm to all the rites, and ceremonies, and principles of the Church of England; and an unyielding persecution on the part of the dignitaries of that church for this non-conformity. It would be recollected that there had been but recently a reformation from popery. A very powerful opposition had existed throughout England against the absurdities, and abuses of the Roman Catholic Church. This we shall presently shew by a recurrence of the facts.

The non-conformists, or puritans wished to have the reformation complete, by reducing the forms of worship and the government of the church to its simple simplicity. They wished to have it as it was organized by its Divine Founder. Or, if there must be established forms, that they should not be repugnant to the principles of the gospel. All this appears reasonable; but reasonable as it was, the avowal of these sentiments exposed them to abuses and persecutions.

The non-conformists maintained also, that the offices of bishops and arch-bishop, deans and arch-deans, &c. were contrary to the gospel,–were the inventions of the pride of man, and an infraction upon the rights of presbyters, who are the only order of ministers established by Christ and his apostles. They maintained, on scripture ground, that all regular ministers are of equal authority and have equal rights, and that Christ forbade any official supremacy. They maintained also, that every church is independent, and has a right to choose its own pastor, and manage its own concerns. These principles, we may easily conceive, exasperated the dignitaries of the church to the highest degree. The arch-bishops continually represented to their royal majesties, that these principles were not only subversive of the government of the church, but also of that of the nation. The effort of this was, that the authority of the crown was vigorously employed to exterminate the principles of the puritans. For more than sixty years before our fathers came hither, the throne was continually sending forth orders, edicts, , and proclamations against them. Through several successive reigns including that of Elizabeth, the puritans had no rest or safety.

These things will be seen in a true light by quoting their own words relative to the facts. A petition was presented by bishop Sandys, praying—“that private baptism and baptism by women may be taken out of the common prayer book. That the cross in baptism may be disallowed as needless and superstitions. And that commissioners may be appointed to reform the ecclesiastical laws.”1 At the same time session of parliament another paper was presented signed by thirty three ministers, some of whom were deans, some arch-deans, and some proctors. They requested “that none may baptize but ministers; and that they may leave off the sign of the cross. That, at the ministration of the communion, the posture of kneeling may be left indifferent. That the use of copes and surplices may be taken away; so that all the ministers may use a grave, comely garment, as they commonly do in preaching; that ministers be not compelled to wear such gowns and caps, as the enemies of Christ’s gospel have chosen to be the special array of their priesthood;–that all the saints days, festivals, and holydays bearing the name of a creature, may be abrogated; and that the punishment of those who do not in all things conform, might be mitigated,” Many other petitions of similar import were presented at different times; but all were rejected and the petitioners either turned out of the ministry, or imprisoned, or banished, or put to death.

The famous martyr, Dr. Hooper, with several other of the most distinguished divines in the kingdom. viz. Rogers, Latimer, Coverdale, Taylor, Philpot, Bradford, &c. were cast into prison, because they questioned the propriety of wearing the white linen surplice, and the square cap, which the church had ordained to be worn. They objected to them because they were the habits of popish priests, and had been instruments of idolatry. All those holy men were afterward martyrs for their non-conformist principles.

The Book of Common Prayer gave authority in certain cases to women to baptize. The non-conformists objected to this as contrary to the word of God. They objected also to kneeling at the sacrament. Their own words on this point are these;–kneeling as the sacrament arose from the notion of transubstantiation of the elements, and is still used by the papists in the worship of their breaden God:–Who admit they should be guilty of idolatry in kneeling before the elements, if they did not believe them to be the real body and blood of Christ. This ceremony was not introduced into the church until antichrist had arisen to his full height; and there is no action in the whole service that looks so much like idolatry as this.”2 “It is mere invention of man not taught by Christ or his apostles. Besides the gesture of kneeling is contrary to the very nature of the Lord’s Supper which is ordained to be a banquet and sign of that sweet familiarity that is between him and the faithful. In what nations is it thought decent to kneel at banquets? &c.3 Christ and his apostles sat at a table.” The non-conformist wished, therefore, that this practice might be discontinued, because it had been an act of idolatry, and because it was not appropriate, nor agreeable to the example of Christ.

They maintained also, that no human authority had a right to impose ceremonies upon the church, which are not required by the gospel; that every church is entitled to the privilege of choosing its own pastor; and that every pastor ought to preach, and not merely read the established service. But in all things they were strenuously and cruelly opposed.

The non-conformist objected to the ring in marriage, and to this expression in the marriage service:–“With this ring, I thee wed, with my body I thee worship, and with all my worldly goods I thee endow, in the name of the Father and the Son, and the Holy Ghost.” This idolatrous phrase they could not conscientiously use. The Rev. Robert Johnson, parson of St. Clements, was apprehended and tried on the charge of having omitted the ring in marriage, & that he had baptized without making the cross! For these offences, and for omitting the above words in marriage in one particular instance, he was shut up in close prison till he died in great poverty and want.4

Many were arrested and brought before the ecclesiastical commission to answer the various charges exhibited against them, and to this question,–“whether the common prayer-book is every part of it grounded on scripture?” For not answering satisfactorily, the Rev. Messrs. Wyburn, Johnson, Brown, Field, Wilcox, Sparrow, and King, were deprived of their ministerial office, and the four last were committed to Newgate prison!

We have already said that the non-conformists or puritans objected to the numerous dignitaries of the Church. The Rev. Mr. Clarke, an officer in the University said in a sermon preached at St. Mary’s that “there ought to be an equality among the ministers of the church,” and that “the hierarchal orders of arch-bishops, patriarchs, and metropolitans, &c. were all introduced into the church by Satan.” For this he was summoned before the vice-chancellor, and expelled from the University. In a petition to parliament in 1586, the puritans say,–“It pierces our hearts with grief to hear the cries of the people for the word of God. The bishops preach not at all or but very seldom. They are encumbered with civilian affairs, not only in their own ecclesiastical commission; all which is contrary to Christ, who says;–my kingdom is not of this world.”5 We can only say here, that every word they uttered against the various dignities of the church, as being contrary to the institution of Christ, brought upon these pious, conscientious men more and more abuse and persecution.

In the year 1572 an act was passed requiring of all ministers of every grade to subscribe to the established articles of faith, the common prayer book, and all the forms therein prescribed. That year an hundred clergymen were deprived of their offices and their livings, and turned away from their people for refusing to subscribe to conformity.6

Previous to this, “the ministers of London were called before the convention, and required on pain of deprivation, to promise and subscribe conformity to the established costume of priests, and to the rites of the common prayer, the 39 articles, and the queen’s injunctions.” Many of these ministers refused compliance and were suspended and deprived of their office:–themselves and their families were reduced to extreme poverty. Rev. Mr. Sampson, dean of Christ Church, and Rev. Mr. Humphries, President of Magdalene College, two of the most eminent divines in the kingdom were imprisoned! The next year, the clergy of London were called up again and required to an absolute conformity; and 37 of them for non-conformity were at once deprived of their ministry, and many reduced to beggary, although the arch-bishop acknowledged they were some of the best preachers in the nation! Very many churches were shut up, and the people deprived of all publick means of salvation!

A little after this, the chief remaining ministers of London, with about one hundred others shared the same fate.

In 1573, the queen published another proclamation, that “all non-conformists should be severely punished.” In the single diocese of Norwich three hundred ministers were suspended at one visitation.7 Some of the most noted were committed to Newgate for refusing to declare, that “the common prayer-book is every part of it grounded on scripture.”

About this time the Baptists appeared:–27 of them were apprehended at a publick meeting; –nine of them banished, and two burnt.

In a few years the persecution made a great scarcity of preachers throughout the kingdom. “In the populous town of Northampton there was not one left.” Some were deprived of their office and forbidden to preach;–some banished, some were imprisoned, and some put to death. The sufferings they endured for conscience’s sake may be faintly perceived by adverting to some of the petitions they sent from their gloomy prisons. In one they say, “We have been condemned to a year’s imprisonment, which we have patiently suffered in the common goal of Newgate, besides four months of close imprisonment before our conviction, which we apprehend to be contrary to law; by these means our poor wives and children are utterly impoverished; our health is very much impaired by the unwholesome savor of the place, and the cold weather; and we are like to suffer still greater extremities. We therefore humbly beseech for the tender mercies of God, and in consideration of our poor wives and children, that we may be set free; or, if that cannot be obtained, that we may be confined in a more wholesome prison.”

Petitions were sent from all quarters by the imprisoned ministers, drawn up in the most effective language, and depicting the most pitiful sufferings. One from the clergy of London, Ely, and Cambridge, says, “We commend to your honors’ compassion, our poor families, together with the cries of our poor people, who are hungering after the word, and are now as sheep having no shepherd. We have applied to the arch-bishops but can get no relief; we therefore humbly beg it at your honors’ hands.”8 But all these moving petitions from ministers and people were all of no avail, so long as those who made them refused absolute conformity to all the forms and dogmas of the church. “What could wise and good men do more in a peaceable way for the liberty of their consciences? They petitioned the queen, applied repeatedly to both houses of parliament, and addressed the convocation and bishops; they moved no riots nor seditions, but fasted and prayed for the queen and the church, as long as they were allowed; and when they could serve them no longer, they patiently submitted to suspensions and deprivations, fines, and imprisonments, til it should please God, of his infinite mercy to open a door for their further usefulness.”

by a supplication from the county of Cornwall it appeared that there were above 90,000 souls, that for want of the word of God were in extreme misery and ready to perish. And they had one hundred and sixty churches either destitute of preachers, or supplied by men guilty of the grossest vices. And this too, when their pious learned ministers were deposed or imprisoned for not being willing to subscribe to forms and principles not warranted by the word of God. Frequently were they imprisoned by the prelates of four or five years without trial, without bail, and without cause. Mr. Barrow and Mr. Greenwood were both executed at Tyburn.

To prevent the puritans from defending their cause, the arch-bishop obtained an order from the queen suppressing the freedom of the press; and establishing a heavy penalty on anyone who should publish any book before it had been submitted for his examination.

All that we have now stated is but just entering a very little into the history of the times which preceded the coming of our pious forefathers. These are but a few facts; and dreadful as they were, they were almost nothing when compared with the shocking barbarities practiced upon the Presbyterians of Scotland under the reign of Charles 2nd. I must refer you to Bishop Burnet’s history for an account of those tragical scenes. I will only observe, that at the beginning of that reign, 2000 ministers were turned out of their livings in one day. And these were the most learned and fearful in the nation!9 The meetings of the Presbyterians were hunted and fired upon by armed forces, “and their blood often mingled with their sacrifices.” All kinds of torture were inflicted upon their bodies;– multitudes were put to death in different ways; and 18000, says Wodrow in his history, suffered in the cruelties of that period.

It should be recollected here that the churches in Scotland were all Presbyterian without a single exception; and had been so for many years, peaceably enjoying their own privileges. But, because, they would not submit, when called upon, to have bishops and arch-bishops set over them by the church of England; and because they would not receive the prayer-book and observe its forms , the most horrible barbarities were inflicted upon them.

But to go any further into particulars here would be increasing the painful sensations of your hearts. We refer you to Neal’s history of the Puritans, together with Bishop Burnet’s history for a particular statement of all the oppressions and sufferings they endured.

I will only observe, that among the non-conformist ministers there were arch-bishops, deans and arch-deans, and some of al grades in the Church of England. It must be remembered that they belonged to that church through all these oppressions, and did not separate from it. They did not wish for divisions. They wished only to see their religion divested of the absurdities & mummery of Roman Catholickism; and brought to that simplicity and purity in which it was instituted by Christ and his apostles. They were men the most eminent for their learning and piety, and willing to suffer anything to for the cause of the Redeemer. No charges were ever substantiated against them, only that they were unwilling to submit to things repugnant to their consciences. For non-conformity to such things, the dignitaries of the church, supported by the crown, deprived the greater portion of the congregations of their faithful beloved ministers; and either shut up the places of worship or put into them a set of men wholly unfit for the sacred office. Very many of them could not preach, and did nothing but read the established service. Many were so ignorant that they could not read it intelligibly, and many were infamous for their vices. “If the people would hear sermons they must go many miles, and at the same time be fined every Sabbath for being absent from their own parish church.”

These, my hearers, were some of the reasons why our forefathers left their native land came to this western world. These were some of their afflictions and persecutions.

2. Let us now consider some of their planting themselves in this country.

Finding that all endeavours for a reform in England were hopeless, and that they were never to be allowed liberty of conscience, the non-conformists came to the conclusion that a separation was necessary. Consequently ‘a number of these devout Christians entered into a covenant, wherein expressing themselves desirous of not only of attending divine worship with a freedom of human inventions, but also of enjoying all the evangelical institutions of that worship; and , like those Macedonians, whom Paul commended, they gave themselves first unto God, and then to one another.’ “they peaceably & willingly embraced a banishment into the Netherlands; where they settled at the city of Leyden10 Here they remained seven or eight years under the pastoral care of Rev. John Robinson. The inconveniencies they experienced in this situation caused them to think of removing to this part of the world. Preparations were accordingly made. They sold their estates, and obtained two vessels for their transportation, one of which however failed them. A day of fasting and prayer was observed, and they prepared to embark. “Their excellent pastor, on his knees by the seaside, poured out their mutual petitions unto God; and having wept in each other’s arms as long as wind and tide would permit, they bade adieu.

After a tempestuous voyage, in which they suffered much, they arrived at the wilderness of New-England, and planted themselves at a place they called New Plymouth. Here they erected some cottages to protect them from the inclemencies of approaching winter. Numerous were their privations and afflictions. In a few months a mortal sickness swept off more than half their number. Worn down by disease and sorrow,–surrounded with gloomy forests filled with ferocious Indians, in want of food, and comfortable dwellings, they sighed away a tedious winter.

But they were not destitute of comforts. The religion of Jesus, for which they endured these sufferings, afforded their divine consolation. The God of Israel was their God, and therefore, “although cast down they were not forsaken.” The pain of being separated from their native country, and their beloved friends, and all the former endearments of life, was mitigated, in some degree, by the consideration that they were also separated from their enemies and persecutors. They were alone in a lonely world of forests; but God was with them here, and had peace of conscience and peace with one another.

Here we must drop the history of this pious company of pilgrims. The arm of God was their defence. His smiles were their richest blessings. Never did Israel, sojourning in the wilderness, present to the eye of Jehovah such an interesting and beloved spectacle as that little band of humble believers. In a few years a number of towns were settled, blessed with happy churches, walking in the faith and order of the gospel. In about 70 years after their arrival, there were in Massachusetts and Connecticut about 132 congregations and Presbyterian churches, blessed with pious and faithful ministers. Surely we may say as did the prophets; O God of hosts, thou hast brought a vine out of Egypt; thou hast cast out the heathen and planted it; thou preparedst room before it and did not cause it to take deep root and it filled the land; the hills were covered with the shadow of it, and the boughs thereof were like the goodly cedars.
Here permit me to observe, that all the Puritans were Calvinist in doctrine. Such were our learned and pious fathers. And the churches which were established here in the first century universally adopted the “Presbyterian Confession of Faith,” a part of which you have in the shorter catechism.

A few remarks will close this address.

We see how easily men may contend about religion in the violation of every principle of religion. The conduct of dignitaries of the English hierarchy indicated an entire want of that love and benevolence, without which the highest professions and warmest zeal may be nothing more than the mania of a party. They seemed to be governed by an exclusive regard for themselves. They knew, that if the non-conformists had succeeded in effecting a reformation in the church, their power and supremacy would have come to an end. They would have been put where ought to have been, on a level with other ministers of the gospel, There is reason to fear that it was an unhallowed pride, a haughtiness of soul, which caused them to oppose, in such a cruel, unchristian manner, the pious wishes of their brethren.

We may see also, that, when ministers and people from the instructions of the word of God, it is impossible to determine how far they may go in errors and absurdities. The Church of
England had exchanged the bible for the prayer book. The question with that body of men, was not, “’what saith the Lord?’ but, what saith the prayer book? The non-conformists only asked for the privileges of regulating their faith and their worship by the bible. Had this been granted them, they would have remained in peace. But the spiritual lord required absolute conformity to all the rites and ceremonies, and principles, which were or might be established by the combined influence of the civil and ecclesiastical authority. And is this the only true church of the blessed Redeemer? Are these the only true ministers of the meek and lowly Jesus?

In all the other countries of Europe, the reformed church were Presbyterian. They were such in Switzerland, in Genoa, in France, in Germany, in Holland, and in Scotland. And such they continue unto this day. In those nations, the churches which broke off from popery immediately returned to the original simplicity of Christianity. Their reformation was complete. They became Presbyterians or independents. But in England, the reformation was only partial. There, some of the absurdities of popery were renounced, and the rest of the system was retained. This was the cause of the difficultly with the non-conformists. They wished to have an entire reformation. But the prelates, seeing that this would destroy all their grandeur and power, were fixed in opposition.

From what has been said, we may learn to estimate our own invaluable privileges. How dearly have they been purchased! What an immensity of suffering, the fathers of New-England endures in laying the foundation of our religious freedom! While we venerate their characters, let us be thankful for their laborious exertions to establish a church on the pure and holy principles of the gospel, free from the inventions and oppressions of men.

The pleasure I feel on this interesting centurial anniversary is greatly heightened by the fact that I address a number of the immediate descendants of our pilgrim fathers. The names of Bradford and Howland, stand on the page of history among those who burst away from the shackles of ecclesiastical tyranny, and braved the dangers of the ocean and the wilderness for the enjoyment of religion in its apostolical simplicity.

John Bradford was burnt at the stake in Yorkshire. William Bradford was burnt at the stake in Yorkshire. William Bradford became pious when a very young man. Being reviled and persecuted for taking part with the non-conformists he said, “I am not only willing to part with everything that is dear to me in this world, for this cause, but I am also thankful that God has given me a heart so to do, and will accept me so to suffer for him.”11 Soon after he escaped into Holland with the persecuted people of God, and from thence came with our fathers to Plymouth. He was the first Governour of THE PLYMOUTH COLONY. Our late venerated and beloved Governour Bradford, who lived and died in this place, was one of his descendants.

Finally, my dear hears, shall we adhere to the privileges, which our ancestors, after so much suffering, have transmitted to us? Or shall we abandon them? Shall we maintain those scriptural doctrines which they maintained, and which gave them “strong consolation?” Or shall we reject them? Is it not in our hearts to say, we will support them? A cause so precious we will not abandon.

Let it be remembered, that New-England was the ground sought out by our fathers for the enjoyment of religion in its original simplicity and purity. This is the refuge, the asylum, the retreat of Presbyterians and independents; and here we claim a free exercise of our privileges.

May the Lord our God be with us, as he was with our fathers: Let him not leave us; that he may incline our hearts unto him, to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes, and his judgments, which he commanded our fathers. Let us follow peace with all men, and holiness without which no man shall see the Lord. Grace be with all those who live our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity.

“With shreds of papal vesture tied
to flaunting robes of princely pride.
In formal state, on sumptuous throne,
Daughter of her of Babylon,
Sat Bigotry. Her chilling breath
to fires of heavenly warmth was death;
Her iron scepter England swayed
Religion withering in its shade.
The shepherd might not kneel to call
on Him the common sire of all
Unless his lips with sharp constraint
Were tuned to accents cold and faint:
For man’s devices had o’erwrought
The volume by a Saviour brought,
And clogged devotion’s soaring wing
That up to heaven should instant spring,
With phrases set which bore no part
In the warm service of the heart.

Strong was the love to heaven which bare
From their dear homes and altars far,
The old, the young, the wise, the brave,
The rich, the noble, and the fair.
And led them o’er the mighty wave
Uncertain peril’s front to dare.
Strong was their love and strong the Power
Whose red right arm, in danger’s hour
Was bared on high their path to show,
Through changeful scenes of weal and wo.

Till in the wilderness arose
His church triumphant o’er her foes.”12


Endnotes

1 Neals History of the Puritans, 1:210.

2 Neal, 2:80.

3 Neal, 2:83.

4 Neal, 1:325.

5 Neal, 1:460.

6 Strype’s Annals, 187.

7 Eleuth, 8.

8 Neal, 1:403.

9 Eleuth, 21.

10 Mather’s Magnalia, 1:45.

11 Mather’s Magnalia, 1.

12 “Yamoyden” a very interesting poem by the Rev. J. W. Eastburn his Friend, recently published.

Proclamation – Thanksgiving Day – 1777

 

This is the text of the Continental Congress’ November 1, 1777 national Thanksgiving Day Proclamation; as printed in the Journals of Congress.

Saturday, November 1, 1777

proclamation-thanksgiving-day-1777-1The committee appointed to prepare a recommendation to the several states, to set apart a day of public thanksgiving, brought in a report; which was taken into consideration, and agreed to as follows:

Forasmuch as it is the indispensable duty of all men to adore the
superintending providence of Almighty God; to acknowledge with gratitude their obligation to him for benefits received, and to implore such farther blessings as they stand in need of; and it having pleased him in his abundant mercy not only to continue to us the innumerable bounties of his common providence, but also smile upon us in the prosecution of a just and necessary war, for the defense and establishment of our unalienable rights and liberties; particularly in that he hath been pleased in so great a measure to prosper the means used for the support of our troops and to crown our arms with most signal success:

proclamation-thanksgiving-day-1777-2It is therefore recommended to the legislative or executive powers of these United States, to set apart Thursday, the 18th day of December next, for solemn thanksgiving and praise; that with one heart and one voice the good people may express the grateful feelings of their hearts, and consecrate themselves to the service of their divine benefactor; and that together with their sincere acknowledgments and offerings, they may join the penitent confession of their manifold sins, whereby they had forfeited every favor, and their humble and earnest supplication that it may please God, through the merits of Jesus Christ, mercifully to forgive and blot them out of remembrance; that it may please him graciously to afford his blessings on the governments of these states respectively, and prosper the public council of the whole; to inspire our commanders both by land and sea, and all under them, with that wisdom and fortitude which may render them fit instruments, under the providence of Almighty God, to secure for these United States the greatest of all blessings, independence and peace; that it may please him to prosper the trade and manufactures of the people and the labor of the husbandman, that our land may yield its increase; to take schools and seminaries of education, so necessary for cultivating the principles of true liberty, virtue and piety, under his nurturing hand, and to prosper the means of religion for the promotion and enlargement of that kingdom which consisteth in righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost.

And it is further recommended, that servile labor, and such recreation as, though at other times innocent, may be unbecoming the purpose of this appointment, be omitted on so solemn an occasion.